I take this back, I guess I was just counting time wrong. 10 seconds seems
to be enough. We really do need to make the popup a bit larger though so
we'll be able to see more wifis in one go. In general, all of our config
windows are so small....


On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Tom Hacohen <[email protected]> wrote:

> 5-10 seconds is too short for working around the issue we are having.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Luis Felipe Strano Moraes <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Tom Hacohen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > I think reducing the refresh rate will make it less painful. I wonder
>> > though, people here have been complaining about semi-complete lists, do
>> you
>> > think reducing the refresh rate will affect that?
>> >
>>
>> Yes, one minute would be far too long for that. IMHO something between 5s
>> to 10s would be ideal. As mentioned before, some networks do not appear
>> directly and it's quite common to open the list and wait until the AP
>> appears, waiting for one minute would be out of the question.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Luis Felipe
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <
>> > [email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I think that always freezing is as painful, as adding an action to
>> > refresh
>> > > is cumbersome.
>> > >
>> > > What about a refresh threshold as Bruno said. It could be one minute,
>> I
>> > > guess it should do without being as annoying, and it's fixed rate at
>> > least.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Tom Hacohen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > So you essentially encountered the same issues as I have. You want a
>> > > > "freeze list" button, I argue that the freezing should be the
>> default.
>> > > > Not the entire list appeared: sounds like a bug and I hope such
>> things
>> > > will
>> > > > get fixed, but I don't think they should stop us from planning on
>> doing
>> > > the
>> > > > right thing.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Zoffix Znet <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Just wanted to add my experience with this exact problem:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > It wasn't in a train, but in a mall's parking lot. I haven't
>> counted
>> > > the
>> > > > > number of access points, but it looked like enough to have a
>> couple
>> > of
>> > > > > screens to scroll through.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I was trying to find an open access point, but the list kept
>> > > refreshing.
>> > > > > I forget now whether the list would scroll to the top, or just
>> > > rearrange
>> > > > > all the access points (or add new ones it found), but I do
>> remember
>> > > > > every time it refreshed, I was lost in the list.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Not the entire list appeared in the popup right away (not sure
>> why—I
>> > > > > wasn't moving), so disabling update when popup is open might not
>> be
>> > > > > feasible.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > At the time, I wished there were a "freeze list" button
>> somewhere, so
>> > > > > once it updated with something you wish to browse through, you
>> could
>> > > > > just stop the list from updating until you unfreeze the list by
>> > > clicking
>> > > > > that button again.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > My two cents.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > ZZ
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 10:34 +0000, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> > > > > > Sounds like a good suggestion, and that will surely be nice,
>> but I
>> > > > don't
>> > > > > > think it solves our issue for people who just want to run
>> through
>> > the
>> > > > > list
>> > > > > > finding an open wifi. As for everyone who said 30 wifis are too
>> > much
>> > > > > anyway
>> > > > > > and etc., maybe I was wrong and it was 20, I was just assessing,
>> > but
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > list was long, too long.
>> > > > > > I don't understand why you are against having a list that
>> doesn't
>> > > > refresh
>> > > > > > while it's open (and possibly has an indication that shows that
>> > it's
>> > > no
>> > > > > > longer up to date or whatever. The only case where this will
>> > actually
>> > > > be
>> > > > > a
>> > > > > > problem is when you are on a train/car/whatever that wifis
>> actually
>> > > > > > significantly change, because if wifis just disappear because of
>> > low
>> > > > > > reception they are not relevant anyway and refreshing the list
>> or
>> > not
>> > > > > would
>> > > > > > not matter.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Bruno Dilly <
>> > [email protected]>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Robert Krambovitis <
>> > > [email protected]
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> From: "Lucas De Marchi" <[email protected]>
>> > > > > > > >> To: "Enlightenment developer list" <
>> > > > > > > [email protected]>
>> > > > > > > >> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 6:16:17 PM
>> > > > > > > >> Subject: Re: [E-devel] Connman module suggestion
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Bruno Dilly <
>> > > > > [email protected]>
>> > > > > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Lucas De Marchi
>> > > > > > > >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Bruno Dilly
>> > > > > > > >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Gustavo Sverzut
>> Barbieri
>> > > > > > > >> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >>>> On Sunday, November 25, 2012, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >>>>
>> > > > > > > >> >>>>> Not when you have 30 wifis in the same area. This
>> makes
>> > > > things
>> > > > > > > >> >>>>> just
>> > > > > > > >> >>>>> impossible. If there's a bug in connman/the module,
>> it
>> > > > should
>> > > > > > > >> >>>>> be fixed, but
>> > > > > > > >> >>>>> usability ATM is just crap.
>> > > > > > > >> >>>>
>> > > > > > > >> >>>>
>> > > > > > > >> >>>>
>> > > > > > > >> >>>> It's in wpa_supplicant that scans, emits a signal and
>> > > connman
>> > > > > > > >> >>>> sends another
>> > > > > > > >> >>>> and we show it
>> > > > > > > >> >>>
>> > > > > > > >> >>> It's right, but... it's possible to handle that in our
>> > > module,
>> > > > > > > >> >>> setting
>> > > > > > > >> >>> a timer while the popup is open. Something like:
>> > > > > > > >> >>>
>> > > > > > > >> >>> popup_open_cb()
>> > > > > > > >> >>>   ...
>> > > > > > > >> >>>   module_data->allow_list_update = EINA_FALSE
>> > > > > > > >> >>>   ecore_timer_add(config_time, _allow_update,
>> module_data)
>> > > > > > > >> >>>
>> > > > > > > >> >>>
>> > > > > > > >> >>> _allow_update(module_data)
>> > > > > > > >> >>>   module->allow_list_update = EINA_TRUE
>> > > > > > > >> >>>   return EINA_FALSE
>> > > > > > > >> >>>
>> > > > > > > >> >>>
>> > > > > > > >> >>> _connman_update_cb(module_data)
>> > > > > > > >> >>>   if (!module_data->allow_list_update)
>> > > > > > > >> >>>     return /* bad */
>> > > > > > > >> >>>   update_popup_list(module_data)
>> > > > > > > >> >>>   module_data->allow_list_update = EINA_FALSE
>> > > > > > > >> >>>   ecore_timer_add(config_time, _allow_update,
>> module_data)
>> > > > > > > >> >>>
>> > > > > > > >> >>>
>> > > > > > > >> >>> The line tagged as bad is bad because if I remember
>> > > correctly,
>> > > > > > > >> >>> connman
>> > > > > > > >> >>> will just send us a signal after something changes
>> > (network
>> > > is
>> > > > > > > >> >>> removed
>> > > > > > > >> >>> / added / list sorted),
>> > > > > > > >> >>> so we can be discarding a change that happened between
>> a
>> > > > > > > >> >>> config_time
>> > > > > > > >> >>> frametime and the outdate information will
>> > > > > > > >> >>> persist in our list for a long time.
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> No.... don't do this. We could maintain the popup list
>> not
>> > > > > > > >> >> synchronized with connman's list. However discarding
>> > updates
>> > > to
>> > > > > > > >> >> the
>> > > > > > > >> >> *connman* list will open cans of worms.
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > OK, that's exactly what the second version does =)
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> So, if we are going to implement this delay, it should
>> be
>> > > only
>> > > > in
>> > > > > > > >> >> the
>> > > > > > > >> >> update_popup_list() function, not in econnman.c.
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Right, that's what is done just below:
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >>>
>> > > > > > > >> >>> So maybe a better would be:
>> > > > > > > >> >>> popup_open_cb()
>> > > > > > > >> >>>   ...
>> > > > > > > >> >>>   module_data->allow_list_update = EINA_FALSE
>> > > > > > > >> >>>   module_data->popup_list_outdated = EINA_FALSE
>> > > > > > > >> >>>   ecore_timer_add(config_time, _allow_update,
>> module_data)
>> > > > > > > >> >>>
>> > > > > > > >> >>>
>> > > > > > > >> >>> _allow_update(module_data)
>> > > > > > > >> >>>   if (module_data->popup_list_outdated)
>> > > > > > > >> >>>       update_popup_list(module_data)
>> > > > > > > >> >>>       module_data->popup_list_outdated = EINA_FALSE
>> > > > > > > >> >>>       return EINA_TRUE
>> > > > > > > >> >>>   module->allow_list_update = EINA_TRUE
>> > > > > > > >> >>>   return EINA_FALSE
>> > > > > > > >> >>>
>> > > > > > > >> >>>
>> > > > > > > >> >>> _connman_update_cb(module_data)
>> > > > > > > >> >>>   update_module_data_list(module_data) /* update
>> internal
>> > > > list,
>> > > > > > > >> >>>   not
>> > > > > > > >> >>> the popup list*/
>> > > > > > > >> >>>   if (!module_data->allow_list_update)
>> > > > > > > >> >>>     module_data->popup_list_outdated = EINA_TRUE
>> > > > > > > >> >>>     return
>> > > > > > > >> >>>   update_popup_list(module_data)
>> > > > > > > >> >>>   module_data->allow_list_update = EINA_FALSE
>> > > > > > > >> >>>   ecore_timer_add(config_time, _allow_update,
>> module_data)
>> > > > > > > >> >>>
>> > > > > > > >> >>>
>> > > > > > > >> >>> And we would need to make sure everything would work
>> fine
>> > > with
>> > > > > > > >> >>> this lists
>> > > > > > > >> >>> out of sync. Also timer should be properly deleted when
>> > > popup
>> > > > is
>> > > > > > > >> >>> closed, etc.
>> > > > > > > >> >>>
>> > > > > > > >> >>> But I definitely don't like the proposal of not
>> updating
>> > the
>> > > > > list
>> > > > > > > >> >>> while the popup is open.
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> I don't either.  However if you have 30+ services,
>> you'll
>> > > have
>> > > > a
>> > > > > > > >> >> hard
>> > > > > > > >> >> time finding the service you want because:
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> 1) If signal strengths change in such a way that
>> services
>> > are
>> > > > > > > >> >> reordered, the popup list will be deleted and recreated
>> > > > > > > >> >> 2) If networks are added/removed, the popup list will be
>> > > > deleted
>> > > > > > > >> >> and recreated.
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> And this (I think) implies that the list will scroll
>> back
>> > to
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > > >> >> initial position. It's not a problem for simpler cases,
>> but
>> > > it
>> > > > > > > >> >> really
>> > > > > > > >> >> is when you are in a public place with lots of wifi APs.
>> > > > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > > > >> >> So, IMO what needs to be done is to either delay updates
>> > *to
>> > > > > popup
>> > > > > > > >> >> list* when popup is open. Or even doesn't allow it at
>> all.
>> > > > > However
>> > > > > > > >> >> the
>> > > > > > > >> >> second approach seems bad for my daily use of opening
>> the
>> > > popup
>> > > > > > > >> >> and
>> > > > > > > >> >> waiting for the service to show up.
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > This second approach is crappy. You would need to open /
>> > close
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > > >> > popup list
>> > > > > > > >> > many times until you see the service you want...
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> this is what is being currently done. not something I'm
>> > > proposing
>> > > > to
>> > > > > > > >> do.
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> We have a list of services deleted, but we don't have a
>> list
>> > of
>> > > > > > > >> services addded. They are mixed with the current ones. Of
>> > course
>> > > > we
>> > > > > > > >> could compare the current list with the new one to check if
>> > > there
>> > > > > > > >> were
>> > > > > > > >> services added or if it was only a reordering update.
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Actually there are other ways to handle this situation.
>> > > > > > > >> > Like just removing / adding networks, not sorting them
>> > again.
>> > > > > > > >> > I believe just removing / adding items to a list widget
>> > > wouldn't
>> > > > > > > >> > mess
>> > > > > > > >> > with its scroll (not 100% sure about it).
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> AFAIR, we did this in the previous connman module,
>> comparing
>> > the
>> > > > > > > >> lists.... and it suffered the same problem.
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> > So the list wouldn't be cleared and repopulated
>> everytime.
>> > It
>> > > > > > > >> > should
>> > > > > > > >> > make users life easier too.
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > But I would go with the second version of the solution
>> I've
>> > > > > > > >> > proposed.
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> agreed,
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> Lucas De Marchi
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Sorry to butt in, but how bout filtering the huge list of
>> > > networks
>> > > > > based
>> > > > > > > on entry text ?
>> > > > > > > > Chances are that you will know what the network you are
>> looking
>> > > for
>> > > > > is
>> > > > > > > called, or have an idea, so typing the 1st few chars should be
>> > > enough
>> > > > > to
>> > > > > > > limit any kind of chaos into a few potential networks.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Something in the lines of everything module, or even a
>> plugin
>> > for
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > > everything module.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Just a thought, feel free to ignore :)
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Sounds like a valid proposal for me as well.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > > > > Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure
>> from a
>> > > > single
>> > > > > > > > web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers,
>> > databases,
>> > > > > vmware,
>> > > > > > > > SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
>> > > > > > > > Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
>> > > > > > > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
>> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > > > > enlightenment-devel mailing list
>> > > > > > > > [email protected]
>> > > > > > > >
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > --
>> > > > > > > Bruno Dilly
>> > > > > > > Lead Developer
>> > > > > > > ProFUSION embedded systems
>> > > > > > > http://profusion.mobi
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > > > Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a
>> > > single
>> > > > > > > web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers,
>> databases,
>> > > > > vmware,
>> > > > > > > SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
>> > > > > > > Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
>> > > > > > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
>> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > > > enlightenment-devel mailing list
>> > > > > > > [email protected]
>> > > > > > >
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a
>> single
>> > > > > web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases,
>> > > vmware,
>> > > > > SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
>> > > > > Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
>> > > > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
>> > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > enlightenment-devel mailing list
>> > > > > [email protected]
>> > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Tom.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a
>> single
>> > > > web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases,
>> > vmware,
>> > > > SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
>> > > > Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
>> > > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > enlightenment-devel mailing list
>> > > > [email protected]
>> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> > > http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
>> > > --------------------------------------
>> > > MSN: [email protected]
>> > > Skype: gsbarbieri
>> > > Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
>> > > web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases,
>> vmware,
>> > > SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
>> > > Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
>> > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > enlightenment-devel mailing list
>> > > [email protected]
>> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Tom.
>> >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
>> > web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
>> > SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
>> > Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
>> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > enlightenment-devel mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Luís Felipe Strano Moraes
>> http://www.strano.org
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
>> web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
>> SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
>> Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
>> _______________________________________________
>> enlightenment-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Tom.
>
>


-- 
Tom.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to