2012/11/28 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[email protected]> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Davide Andreoli <[email protected]> > wrote: > > 2012/11/28 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[email protected]> > > > >> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Davide Andreoli < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > 2012/11/27 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[email protected]> > >> > > >> >> Hi Dave, > >> >> > >> >> Would you change the per-fileman window opinfo to just show the info > >> >> relevant to that window (source or destination)? > >> >> > >> > > >> > Hi, > >> > I'm not sure that what you want is the "correct" behaviour...I have > some > >> > doubt, > >> > for example: > >> > what should happen if one start a long copy operation (thus the > >> > progress is shown) and then change to another directory (in the same > >> win)? > >> > should the progress be hidden ? and then reshow when I come back > >> > to that folder? :/ > >> > I probably prefer it as is now: the fm is working, no matter what > folder > >> are > >> > you browsing... > >> > > >> > other opinions? > >> > >> you can only change the directory if it's "in place", that's not the > >> default setting. > >> > > > > yes, not the default, but it's mine setting :) > > i know, i know :-) > > > >> I'd say that if you change the directory you must re-evaluate whenever > >> you show or not the progress. if you go up, it hides. If you go back > >> to it, it shows. > >> > > > > as you want it the user that change folder will have the impression that > > the operation is over, while it's still working without any progress > > indication... > > then I need to go back to that folder to see the progress of my copy :/ > > AFAIR you could add the opinfo to the bg/overlay as gadcon, no? I > recall this used to work. Then you can unify (in a likely bigger > space) all the operations in one place. As it is, it may clutter the > UI a lot. >
Yes, infact I'm only working on the desktop gadget, I have not touched (yet) the one that is shown in the fwin... a little scared by that code :P I agree that now the UI is cluttered, but still not convinced by your idea... maybe we can just make an option to fully enable/disable the progress inside the window? > > > > sorry, but I really prefer it as it's now, so I'm not going to change it, > > also IMHO > > the efm has lots of other issues that are much more critical than this > one. > > that's for sure. > > > -- > Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > http://profusion.mobi embedded systems > -------------------------------------- > MSN: [email protected] > Skype: gsbarbieri > Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel: > INSIGHTS What's next for parallel hardware, programming and related areas? > Interviews and blogs by thought leaders keep you ahead of the curve. > http://goparallel.sourceforge.net > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel: INSIGHTS What's next for parallel hardware, programming and related areas? Interviews and blogs by thought leaders keep you ahead of the curve. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
