Am Dienstag, 11. Juni 2013 um 16:19 schrieb Rafael Antognolli: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo <seojuyu...@gmail.com > (mailto:seojuyu...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Leif Middelschulte < > > leif.middelschu...@gmail.com (mailto:leif.middelschu...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > > > > Am Dienstag, 11. Juni 2013 schrieb Daniel Juyung Seo : > > > > > > > Hello, this follows elementary policy. > > > > > > > > 1. focused object A lose its focus when another object is going to get > > > > focus. > > > > 2. an object is focused when it's clicked. > > > > > > > > so the sequence is > > > > 1. click object B > > > > 2. focused object A lose its focus > > > > 3. object B gets focus > > > > > > > > So only one object is focused at any point. > > > > > > > > It's not possible to unfocus other object before any other object is > > > > clicked. > > > > Because clicked signal will trigger unfocus signal. > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, as I already imagined, it's due to the current implementation. > > > > Not just an implementation. It's a policy. > > > > > > > Can't we trigger "unfocused" callbacks, before we trigger "clicked" > > > callbacks? I assume that it's the way it is, because Edje understands > > > > > > > > > How come? > > I repeat. > > 1. An object is focused when it's clicked. > > 2. An object is unfocused when other object is going to be focused. > > > > It means mouse click -> unfocused -> focused. > > If I understood correctly, Leif is saying that this is not what is > happening, and his test proves that (I didn't try it). He is saying > that the current order is: > > mouse click -> focused -> unfocused I haven't considered "focused" events yet, because I want to react to "clicked while focused" (sets stuff) and "unfocused" (resets stuff) events. But with current behavior I get: set (click) -> reset (unfocused) So, afaics, we basically ignore the concept of object focus for "clicked" events. Maybe we can have "focused,clicked" or whatever?
Thanks for your explanations, Leif > > Regards, > -- > Rafael Antognolli > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net (http://SF.net) email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > (mailto:enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net) > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
