Hello. On 07/03/2013 11:48 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > > If you want to have a look and help us fixing bugs or marking things as > false positive please register at scan.coverity.com and request access > to these projects. Daniel or myself can then approve your access and you > can have a look. > > efl: http://scan.coverity.com/projects/552 > elm: http://scan.coverity.com/projects/553 > e: http://scan.coverity.com/projects/554
Some numbers: EFL: 521,687 lines of code and an initial set of 559 defects results in a defect density of 1.07. 1.0 is what they rate as industry standard and means 1 defect in thousand lines of code. Elm has 210,048 but only 77 initial defects resulting in a way lower defect density of 0.37. E is a middleground with 273,355 lines of code and 205 initial defects resulting in a defect density of 0.75. All in all that looks quite ok to me. I suspect some false positives in efl especially in the way we use eina_list and hash and take care about resource free'ing. regards Stefan Schmidt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
