On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 13:42:22 +0100 Stefan Schmidt <s.schm...@samsung.com> said:
> Hello. > > On 07/03/2013 11:48 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > > > > If you want to have a look and help us fixing bugs or marking things as > > false positive please register at scan.coverity.com and request access > > to these projects. Daniel or myself can then approve your access and you > > can have a look. > > > > efl: http://scan.coverity.com/projects/552 > > elm: http://scan.coverity.com/projects/553 > > e: http://scan.coverity.com/projects/554 > > Some numbers: > > EFL: 521,687 lines of code and an initial set of 559 defects results in > a defect density of 1.07. 1.0 is what they rate as industry standard and > means 1 defect in thousand lines of code. > > Elm has 210,048 but only 77 initial defects resulting in a way lower > defect density of 0.37. > > E is a middleground with 273,355 lines of code and 205 initial defects > resulting in a defect density of 0.75. > > All in all that looks quite ok to me. I suspect some false positives in > efl especially in the way we use eina_list and hash and take care about > resource free'ing. > > regards > Stefan Schmidt i'd say that pretty damned good... considering. i think we may be a bit harsh on ourselves at times... BUT WE SHOULD BE! industry average is not good enough! :) m(elm is surprising btw! - same with e. i would have expected efl is better). i am sure we can knock off a lot of the defects found and come out smelling like roses. 0 defects... here we come. :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
