Hello the number of elementary issues reported by coverity is now reduced from 77 to 29. Thanks for the report, coverity.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Daniel Juyung Seo <seojuyu...@gmail.com>wrote: > But the number of reported defects is smaller than I expected. > That's better than people know :) > > Anyhow I will fix bugs reported by coverity. > Thanks. > > Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri < > barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com >> >wrote: >> >> > On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 13:42:22 +0100 Stefan Schmidt < >> s.schm...@samsung.com> >> > said: >> > >> > > Hello. >> > > >> > > On 07/03/2013 11:48 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: >> > > > >> > > > If you want to have a look and help us fixing bugs or marking >> things as >> > > > false positive please register at scan.coverity.com and request >> access >> > > > to these projects. Daniel or myself can then approve your access and >> > you >> > > > can have a look. >> > > > >> > > > efl: http://scan.coverity.com/projects/552 >> > > > elm: http://scan.coverity.com/projects/553 >> > > > e: http://scan.coverity.com/projects/554 >> > > >> > > Some numbers: >> > > >> > > EFL: 521,687 lines of code and an initial set of 559 defects results >> in >> > > a defect density of 1.07. 1.0 is what they rate as industry standard >> and >> > > means 1 defect in thousand lines of code. >> > > >> > > Elm has 210,048 but only 77 initial defects resulting in a way lower >> > > defect density of 0.37. >> > > >> > > E is a middleground with 273,355 lines of code and 205 initial defects >> > > resulting in a defect density of 0.75. >> > > >> > > All in all that looks quite ok to me. I suspect some false positives >> in >> > > efl especially in the way we use eina_list and hash and take care >> about >> > > resource free'ing. >> > > >> > > regards >> > > Stefan Schmidt >> > >> > i'd say that pretty damned good... considering. i think we may be a bit >> > harsh >> > on ourselves at times... >> > >> > BUT WE SHOULD BE! industry average is not good enough! :) m(elm is >> > surprising >> > btw! - same with e. i would have expected efl is better). >> > >> >> that confirms that coverity tool is clearly bogus AND elm has too much >> lines of code in it (that does nothing, like 5 lines per callback >> function, >> or more such as static\nname_cb(void *data)\n{\nNameType *t;\n t = >> data;\n...\n}\n) :-D >> >> -- >> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri >> http://profusion.mobi embedded systems >> -------------------------------------- >> MSN: barbi...@gmail.com >> Skype: gsbarbieri >> Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: >> >> Build for Windows Store. >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> enlightenment-devel mailing list >> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
