Hello.

On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 23:25, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:57:49 +0100 Stefan Schmidt <ste...@datenfreihafen.org>
> said:
> 
> > Hello.
> > 
> > On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 09:17, Adrien Nader wrote:
> > > 
> > > I don't expect, nor intend, to delay the release of 1.9. I only want to
> > > record my belief as a packager that the release cycles are too short and
> > > that the stabilization phases are _way_ too short (let's face it, no
> > > packager does continuous integration/packaging).
> > 
> > Is that a guts feeling or do you have concrete examples or problems
> > you see with the curent state of 1.9?
> > 
> > You are the first packager that complains about this so far. What
> > distro are you packging for? What is the release cycle of this distro?
> > 
> > I personally think that three months are not that bad. I agree on the
> > short stabilizatiopn phase at the end tho. For 1.10 we will shift it a
> > bit to have three weeks at the end.
> 
> shall we make the middle stabilization phase just 1 week then?

Exactly the plan. 1 week after the first merge window and three weeks
at the end. I will put up a revised plan for discussion later today
which includes this.

regards
Stefan Schmidt

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool.
Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer
Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports.
Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to