Now please calm down and explain me what you don't agree with. On 05/01/2014 01:25 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 01/05/14 11:14, Yossi Kantor wrote: >> Oh... that. >> Nothing to worry about. The functionality of elm_widget_item STAYS AS IT >> IS. Just the names are gone. >> Instead of doing *elm_widget_item_text_set_hook_set(stuf...) *it will be >> *eo_do(elm_object_item_text_hook_set, stuff...)* >> (or even elm_object.. legacy if method is not protected). >> > That's stupid, and if you don't fix it in the process, I'll just fix it > after, but will most likely downvote the patch. Those functions should > be completely removed, as they were never exposed in API and are not > needed thanks to Eo. > > -- > Tom. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE > Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get > unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. > Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." > http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
