On 01/05/14 11:32, Yossi Kantor wrote:
> Now please calm down and explain me what you don't agree with.

Stop making things personal. I've stayed relatively quiet with you 
questioning my professional integrity earlier in this thread, but I 
guess I shouldn't have.

You need to understand that:

1. When people talk about your patches/design decisions they are not 
talking about you.
2. People reply because they care about the quality of the project, and 
they will continue to reply and criticize when needed.
3. You can be wrong.
4. The fact that you've been given a task by someone does not by any 
means mean it'll get into the codebase. It has to be good and sensible.
5. You are making it damn hard for me (others?) to want to help you.


As for this specific matter, this was a cheap-man's inheritance 
implemented for object items. Inheritance is already solved and made 
redundant by Eo. Therefore, those functions are not needed any more, and 
since they are internal, they can be easily, and should be, disposed of.

--
Tom.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.  Get 
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to