On 07/27/2017 02:14 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 22:03:04 +0200 Pierre Couderc <pie...@couderc.eu> said:


that is exactly how our policy works today. efl is done exactly this way.
enlightenment should/does also run this way. mike does maintain stable branches
for releases and he does backport/cherry pick to them. stable releases come from
these branches (micro releases).
Is it true too for terminology ?
I do not see a "terminology-1.0" branch in https://git.enlightenment.org/apps/terminology.git/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to