[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>     
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>>> Behalf Of Carsten Haitzler
>>> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 6:12 PM
>>> To: Dustin Jenkins
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [e-users] E17 Dual Head (In the future.)
>>>
>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:39:05 -0700 Dustin Jenkins
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> babbled:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Hello all.  I've been using E16 for the past year and
>>>>         
>>> really like it,
>>>       
>>>> and use E17 off and on (E17 is down right sexy).  I've Googled and
>>>> scanned the archives and can't get a concrete answer.  I
>>>>         
>>> like how E16
>>>       
>>>> does Virtual Desktops on my dual head system (3200x1200) in
>>>>         
>>> that both
>>>       
>>>> monitors display a single Virtual Desktop, but E17 does it
>>>>         
>>> differently.
>>>       
>>>> It looks like E17 treats both monitors as having their own set of
>>>> Virtual Desktops, but I'm not totally sure as flipping
>>>>         
>>> around desktops
>>>       
>>>> with Shift+Alt gave different results.  Will E17 have
>>>>         
>>> support for the
>>>       
>>>> way E16 does Virtual Desktops on Dual Head systems one day?
>>>>         
>>>  Is Dual
>>>       
>>>> Head support still considered buggy?
>>>>         
>>> xinerama (multiple zones) support is stable and working fine
>>> - i have been testing it on a daily basis now for a while (ie
>>> using it all day). multihead (ie 2 separate x roots) i can't
>>> comment on atm as i haven't tested this for ages.
>>>
>>> as for how e does multiple heads - the vast majority of users
>>> prefer the way it splits the heads up so each has its own set
>>> of virtual desktops. the only sane way to accomodate bother
>>> mechanisms is add a "sync" option where the virtual desktop
>>> changes of any 1 zone or container (screen) are mirrored on all others
>>> - this will get you as close to what you want as possible
>>> without major headaches code/design-wise. (ie flip desktosp
>>> on 1 screen - the other screen flips too, but there are still
>>> 2 sets of virtual desktops).
>>>
>>> patches of course accepted - as this seems to be desired by
>>> only a small set of people - not the majority, and most
>>> people used to the "old way" once they try the new one
>>> convert and begin to like it much more... i see not a lot of
>>> point investing much effort into this... :)
>>>
>>>       
>> Poop.
>>
>> R.
>>     
>
> Wierded me out when I first tried it, but use it for a while. I love it.
> Gives you windows movable from one monitor to another yet still feels like
> dual head.
>   
I agree actually. For the past little while it has indeed been 
different, but now that I have my keybindings set up for quick access, 
it's the cat's meow. Change is good, especially how E differentiates 
itself from other Window Managers. I've happily adapted to this dual 
head support.

Cheers


> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
>   


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to