On 04/02/2007 08:57, MillTek wrote:
> Ravenlock wrote:
>> On 04/02/2007 00:29, MillTek wrote:
>>> Ravenlock wrote:
>>>> On 04/01/2007 21:39, MillTek wrote:
>>>>  
>>>>> Hi Ravenlock,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the reply. No, I don't use xscreensaver. Just E.  I 
>>>>> start that through entrance which is exec'ed by .xinitrc.    The 
>>>>> problem is still there.
>>>>>     
>>>>
>>>> err... you start entrance via your .xinitrc?  Doesn't sound right. 
>>>> Though I don't think that has any impact here.
>>>>   
>>> I should have said that I use startx which in turn uses .xinitrc 
>>> which starts entrance and that starts E
>>>
>>
>> entrance has a daemon "entranced" which should be used to start it.  
>> But this is a different issue.  May or may not have any bearing here.  
>> Maybe  you could refrain from using entrance till we investigate this 
>> a bit more?  Just trying to remove variables here.  Let me know how 
>> you feel regarding this.  :)
>>
>>>
>>>
> No problem. So what do you feel is the best initiation sequence for E?

You can use "enlightenment_start" from within your .xinitrc file, as 
opposed to "entrance".

> 
> Jim
> 
> 


-- 
Regards,
Ravenlock

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to