On 12/20/2011 02:54 PM, Andrea Suisani wrote: > On 12/20/2011 02:07 PM, mh wrote: >> That looks like it updates the modules to revision 66220? That's the first >> version I had trouble with. Try 66218, which worked for me. > > oh thanks... I misread your message > thanks for the correction, I will retry > with the correct svn revision
I've just tried but downgrading e/src/modules to rev 66218 (svn update -r 66218) with no luck cause e fails to build whereas if downgrade all e to rev 66218 it builds fine and more importantly blank screen goes away I've no more time to dig further for today, I hope that Leif will take care of the issue in the meantime andrea > [cut] >>>> I'm planning to do what mh did (see his last email >>>> on this thread) and report back if mh's recipe is proved >>>> to be right >>> >>> it did't work.... that's what i did >>> >>> cd e/trunk/e/src/modules >>> svn update -r 66220 >>> easy_e17 -s --only=e > > > andrea > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Write once. Port to many. > Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create > new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the > Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
