On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 12:40 PM Paul Kosinski <[email protected]> wrote:

> It seems to me that automatic update of *any* software would *not* be
> acceptable to some enterprises. Don't some enterprises run acceptance
> tests on a new version of software before deploying it? Even if the new
> version simply fixes a bug, rather than modifying overt behavior,
> changes can give rise to extra Help Desk calls. What some might
> consider The Right Thing others might consider disruptive.
>
> Personally, I *never* allow automatic updates to software I use. I've
> been doing software development of various kinds for decades, and I
> always want to know what and why changes are made before I install
> them. The reason I use ESR is exactly because it *doesn't* change out
> from under me. (Except for the recent Add-On disaster, of course.)
>

Background updates will honor existing update update preferences and
enterprise configuration for the install so you won't lose this control.

Note background updating will be triggered through the Windows Task
Scheduler [1], which will execute a component within Firefox's install (the
updater) so technically we're not turning anything over to the operating
system here related to updates. (Aside from the downloading through BITS
I've mentioned previously.)

Regards,
Jim

[1]
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/taskschd/task-scheduler-start-page
_______________________________________________
Enterprise mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise

To unsubscribe from this list, please visit 
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to 
[email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Reply via email to