On 11/10/00 3:41 PM, "Dan Crevier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 11/10/2000 3:27 PM, "Christian Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> To add my 2 cents on this subject.  First of all, why has the MS Windows team
>> decided to adopt a non standard and propriety email format such as MS Rich
>> Text � plain text and HTML not good enough for them?  IMHO, just another
>> example of MS (windows team) creating their own �standards� and because they
>> have such a huge market share everyone else that uses real standards is made
>> to suffer.  
> 
> I believe that the MS RichText format predated HTML.

I'm not sure but if that is the case why is Outlook on windows the only
email package that uses it???


--
To unsubscribe:               <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To search the archives:
          <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>

Reply via email to