Re: Entourage unusable on OS X (s-l-o-o-o-o-o-w-w-w)

[Welch, John C.]

On 03/28/2001 21:44, "Harry (lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Oh, puhleeze, don't even get me started the 'almost bordering on
> incompetence' development efforts of the NeXTSTEP team (because that's
> really what they are, aren't they?) Not much Mac mindset in that group -
> starting with features that are more of a burden, and ending with almost
> total lack of respect for user feedback. Like I said, don't get me started.

Don't get me started on the rebuttal then. Having done waaay too much work
on OS - type programming, (never again), I am astounded at how well the dock
works, and how it fits into the X paradigm. X is not the next verision of 9,
nor is it the NeXT version of 9. It's new. Deal. It's got new bugs. Deal.
Read readmes. Don't install on a hacked system. Don't expect every version
of "imaspiffyextension" to work in Classic.

The Dock is there. It's better than it was. It will most likely get improved
more. Apple's not stupid, nor do they "not care" about the OS.

john

-- 
"We ain't making no goddamn corn flakes here."
Col. Charlie Beckwith, founder of Delta Force


-- 
To unsubscribe:               <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To search the archives: 
          <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>