On 6/6/02 11:39 PM, "Dan Crevier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/6/2002 4:39 PM, "Julian Vrieslander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> There are several advantages to using DV over Entourage. The differences >> are most important if you receive large digests containing dozens of >> messages, and lots of threads. > > Have you tried bursting digests with Entourage? You seem to get all the > advantages you mention... Actually, in the message that you referenced, I tried to describe some of the specific features and advantages provided by Digest Viewer which are missing from Entourage (with or without the burst action enabled). I was not implying that Entourage's handling of digests is broken or badly implemented. It's better than the other email clients I have tried. For some users, handling mail lists completely within Entourage makes sense. Others may find benefits from using Digest Viewer or other external tools. This could easily lead into a more general discussion about software design and marketing strategies. Big apps that try to do everything for everyone, vs smaller more specialized apps (possibly from different vendors) which can be integrated to work together. A familiar debate. I have some thoughts (both positive and critical) about how Entourage fits into this, but I think I'll save my comments for another day, another thread. -- Julian Vrieslander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
