On 15/7/02 10:55 pm, "Harry Zink" wrote: >> If all the people who are complaining about his had declined the invitation >> instead of ignoring it or accepting it, there wouldn't be this trouble now. > > Blame the users, #2. > > The fact remains, THERE IS THIS TROUBLE NOW. > > Why? > > Because, just maybe, a refinement of the notification mechanism might make > this process a bit less invasive.
How could it be less invasive than turned off, if that's what you want? > > I have been quite clear that only mailing lists are as susceptible to this, > as the workflow of a mailing list allows such stuff to slip through (except > in the case of the handful of perfect people on this list). That applies to YOUR workflow. This is not necessarily the same as anyone else's. > > A) It needs to be addressed. I don't see this. I understand how it works, and it seems just fine to me. > > B) None of you have anything to do with the MacBU, or are in any position to > address this, so, essentially, your comments don't really matter. And neither are you, so the same must apply to your comments :-) > > Harry > -- Barry Wainwright <http://www.barryw.net> "The key to being a good manager is keeping the people who hate me away from those who are still undecided." -- Casey Stengel -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
