> That applies to YOUR workflow. This is not necessarily the same as anyone > else's.
And here's the wonderful thing, Barry: Everyone else's workflow is not like mine, nor necessary like your's (or that dork, Eric's). The point is that the solution I suggested would be acceptable, and suitbale for everyone's workflow, with a minimum of invasiveness, or need to pour over manuals. > I don't see this. I understand how it works, and it seems just fine to me. That doesn't mean that others don't see a problem with it, just because you have none. See above. > And neither are you, so the same must apply to your comments :-) I'm affected by it, as in the case that I have noticed it. Let's see how many others will be affected by it on the 19th. I don't have to be part of the MacBU to point out that there is an issue that could become a problem, and that there is a simple solution to it. The same does not hold true to you, if you preclude to tell me how my workflow 'should' be. Harry -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
