on 1/21/03 11:29 AM, Paul Berkowitz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Sort where exactly? If you're in the Address Book, and you have the NAME > column clicked, then it sorts by Last Name, even though it displays as > FirstName LastName. (If there's only a First Name, it appears alphabetically > mixed with the other contacts' Last Names.) Since you're not sorting on > Company, contacts with no name but only company are blank as far as name > sorting is concerned, so they'll be all at the top. Unfortunately, since > there is no sub-sorting procedure, all the "blank name" contacts - whether > they have company or not, or just email address, etc. - will not be sorted; > i.e. they will display in the order in which they were created, which won't > help you much.
Ah... I was hoping that sorting by company, then by name, would retain the sort order of the company within name if there was no name. But what I hear you saying is that by sorting on name (i.e. clicking the name column) wipes out any previous sort operation entirely. Too bad. So yes... Sub sorting (either explicit or implicit) would seem to me to be a GoodThing�. Open nets... -- Norman Ferguson | Dir. of Technology Services | Tekgnosys Member, Apple Consultants Network | Microsoft Certified Professional Office: 540-387-4422 | Cell: 540-819-4014 | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1917 Maylin Drive; Suite 103 | Salem, VA 24153 -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
