Scott Haneda wrote: > Like I said before, for browsing I will use Safari, but it > lacks the features I need to use for development testing. I can live with > the prefs not holding, its the cookies and the remembering of http auth that > is driving me nuts. As for using another broweser, I have tried them all, > and they all are way worse off the Explorer, flat out slow, wont post form > data on return, etc etc.
At the risk of taking this increasingly off-topic thread even further off-topic... I agree that Safari is not yet ready for development testing. But I'm puzzled as to why you prefer Explorer instead of Camino or Mozilla. In my experience, the latter two are much more standards-compliant. Mozilla isn't speedy, but it has far more granular control over JavaScript and cookies. Camino lacks these features, but is much faster and -- for me -- offers the best balance of standards compliance, performance, features, and stability. Obviously your mileage must vary, or else you wouldn't have dismissed Camino/Mozilla. I just wondered how they could possibly be called "way worse off" than Explorer... ;-) Justin -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
