Peter C.S. Adams wrote [1/30/04 9:03 AM]: > Thus spake Kirk McElhearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, circa 1/30/2004 2:44 AM: >> Well, you're wrong. Many of the messages that Entourage marks as spam do >> come from editors, readers or other people I don't know, and many of them to >> translate into work. > > It's a nice idea, but the Entourage JMF is just junk. I'd guess half of what > it marks as junk is a false positive. I turned it off. I can tell spam at a > glance and spend about two minutes a day deleting it all in batches and have > scripts that delete viruses (and much of the bunch of spam). I am going to > try SpamSieve, though. > > peter
Hunh? Your guess regarding the JMF would be just that, and therefore useless. Why try SpamSieve if you have no problem deleting it in batches, in two minutes? Odd logic. But, okay. -- Gary -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
