On or near 1/30/04 6:03 AM, Peter C.S. Adams at [EMAIL PROTECTED] observed:
> Thus spake Kirk McElhearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, circa 1/30/2004 2:44 AM: >> Well, you're wrong. Many of the messages that Entourage marks as spam do >> come from editors, readers or other people I don't know, and many of them to >> translate into work. > > It's a nice idea, but the Entourage JMF is just junk. I'd guess half of what > it marks as junk is a false positive. I turned it off. I can tell spam at a > glance and spend about two minutes a day deleting it all in batches and have > scripts that delete viruses (and much of the bunch of spam). I am going to > try SpamSieve, though. > I turned off the JMF and went with SpamSieve months ago, never regretted it. FAR fewer false positives, and FAR fewer failures to detect spam. -- Microsoft MVP for Entourage/OE/Word (MVPs are volunteers) Allen Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Entourage FAQ site: <http://www.entourage.mvps.org/> AppleScripts for Outlook Express and Entourage: <http://members.thinkaccess.net/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Scripts/> Entourage Help Pages: <http://www.entourage.mvps.org/> -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
