On 1/30/04 16:39, "IT Matters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It's a nice idea, but the Entourage JMF is just junk. I'd guess half of what
>> it marks as junk is a false positive. I turned it off.
>
> My experience of the JMF turned up to almost 'max' is that it results in
> about 2% false positives. I average about 200 emails per day of which about
> 100 are junk, so 4% of genuine email is misidentified. I regard this as OK
> and where I see a pattern I try to improve matters with rules. I don't
> believe any spam device is 100% effective when looked at over a longish
> period.
I'd concur with your figures - I get maybe 1% in false positives, with the
filter set to its highest setting.
Kirk
Co-author of Microsoft Office v. X Inside Out
http://www.mcelhearn.com/insideout.html
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.mcelhearn.com . . . . . .
. . Kirk McElhearn | Chemin de la Lauze | 05600 Guillestre | France . .
--
To unsubscribe:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/>
old-archive:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
