It sounds like Adam has an use for a rule that does redirection of emails. Entourage offers a "forward to" action for rules, which is not quite the same thing. Perhaps redirection would require an Applescript?
-- Joshua On 1/7/08 9:00 AM, "Adam Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/5/08 12:35 PM, Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Jan 5, 2008, at 10:37 AM, Neil wrote: >> >>> When you set up your out of office message, please make sure not to >>> send them to this list. ;-) That sounds obvious, but it >>> has happened before. >> >> I've never really seen the need for this feature. >> If you send someone a letter in the mail and they are away you don't >> hear back from them until they return and receive the letter. Why >> should I expect an instantaneous response to my e-mail? > > In certain business situations, such as mine, business can be lost if emails > are not attended to promptly. A sales order, for example, or request for > information. > > And it is precisely because of that that I would never count on an OOO > message. If I am going to be without access to email for an extended period > of time, I arrange for someone to cover for me and check my email while I am > gone. Telling a potential client or business partner that I'm not around and > that it's /their/ responsibility to contact someone else is unacceptable, at > least in my industry. -- Joshua -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
