Wonderful photos and excellent tale of your western adventure!

I'd love to get out there and walk among the Giant Trees, too,
someday...

It is amazing how even a "modest" Redwood, Douglas Fir, etc. is just
so BIG!!!


On Nov 18, 3:39 pm, "Dale Luthringer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> AWESOME !!!
>
> Great pics and report, Will.
>
> I'm also embarrassed to say I've never seen the redwoods out there
> either.  It's on my must see list.  When I visit my sister in Seattle.
> that'll be my opportunity.
>
> Dale
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>
> Behalf Of Will Blozan
> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 9:08 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Aven Blozan; Benjamin Blozan; Benjamin Brown; Riley, Brian; Carl and
> Kathie Blozan; Chris Earle; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Harley Erickson;
> Kent Priestley; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Marie Antoine; Richard
> Preston; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dillard, Robert L; Steve Sillett; Tobe
> Sherrill; Tom Remaley; William Hascher; Woody Bousquet; Yolanda Hall;
> 'Chamberlin, Joe'; 'Nick Blozan'
> Subject: [ENTS] Big Basin Redwoods State Park, CA
>
> ENTS,
>
> In October I was invited as a guest speaker to a corporate meeting in
> Santa Clara, CA. I was honored to be paid to fly out (with my wife
> too!), get picked up in a limo, three nights in the Marriott, gourmet
> food and drink. Well that part is over, unfortunately. BUT I was able to
> spend a day on "free time" to meet for the first time the superlative
> coastal redwoods. From our hotel we could look to the west and see the
> redwood spires on the Santa Cruz Mountains, and to our east the
> mountains were bare and covered in scrub and grass. The fog influence
> was very pronounced and we dried up quickly in the arid 15% humidity of
> Santa Clara. What a difference a few miles and elevation make!
>
> I was a bit embarrassed as a big tree hunter to have never seen the
> redwoods- and the tallest I have ever personally measured being a twig
> on the Montpelier Estate in VA. Well, I bumped up my personal best to a
> hair under 300' tall. My wife Heidi and I spent several hours in Big
> Basin Redwoods State Park, CA which was the first park in the state.
> Although much of it appeared to have been selectively logged many fine
> trees remained which had over 100 years of growth since park
> establishment in 1902.http://www.bigbasin.org/
>
> Heidi and a "big" redwood
>
> I was immediately struck with the height and density of trees but also
> with the low diversity of canopy trees. The canopy was mainly composed
> of two species, redwood and coastal Douglas-fir. A mix of tanoak
> (Lithocarpus densiflorus), Pacific madrone (Arbutus menziesii), and
> various shrubs filled out the bulk of the mid-canopy and understory. The
> ridges made for a quick forest transition to unimpressive (as in small
> trees) dry site species of oak and twisty madrone. Well, they could have
> been impressive but I had no idea what species I was looking at. The
> visitor's center was surprisingly lacking in useful guides to trees,
> unless I purchased a book. The madrones were awesome and looked like
> huge rhododendrons.
>
> I was truthfully more impressed with the Dougies and tanoaks than the
> redwoods. I knew I had no chance of any new records for any species,
> specifically redwood so my interest was drawn to other species. I
> roughed out many heights all day and was impressed my laser battery did
> not die. I focused on the Dougies but soon took notice of the tanoaks. I
> had never seen the species before and was interested in them because
> they were not conifers and likely have not been intensively sampled due
> their obvious sub-canopy stature. Several quick shots indicated that
> these slender members of the beech family were in excess of 120'- which
> is admittedly pretty impressive for this family in NA. I spotted one
> that although winding its way beneath the redwood and Dougie canopy
> reached 144.3 feet. Their wood must be seriously strong since this tree
> was only 6'10" in girth!
>
> Tallest tanoak
>
> My goal for the day was to find a tree over 300 feet tall. I know, an
> arbitrary number but it was a goal nonetheless. As Heidi and I traversed
> several trails and explored small coves and ravines I measured and
> measured and measured. The website I looked at before the visit
> indicated trees up to 329 feet tall in the park. As the day went on I
> had a hard time breaking 240 feet. Near a campground we came across a
> small, sheltered cove with really impressive redwoods towering above
> huge cut stumps. I figured the remaining trees would have bolted to the
> sky- and they looked it. The packed redwoods were very dense and had
> burned bark up to 120 feet up the trunks. The charcoal contrasted
> beautifully with the red unburned bark and the green foliage. Beautiful
> and thrifty as they were an hour of searching and measuring a dozen
> trees or so did not yield a single 300 footer. I hit 294.6' and 296.7'.
> Perhaps elsewhere in the park a 300 footer can be found- maybe closer to
> the ocean. After all, there are 18,00 acres of forest and I only saw a
> tiny bit.
>
> The tallest redwoods measured
>
> Also near the campground grew what to me was the most impressive tree of
> the day. It was a Douglas-fir that shot like an arrow from the side of a
> small stream. I shot the laser to the top and thought it was reading
> erratic. Holy moly! this tree was roughed out to be over 250 feet tall!
> Few redwoods had been seen all day that tall so it deserved some more
> detailed attention. Heidi helped with a basal target and the impressive
> tree turned out to be 22'4" cbh and 269.1 feet tall. This one tree was
> worth the trip!
>
> Huge Douglas-fir
>
> Upon returning to the visitor center to meet our ride we discovered that
> the 329 foot tree- listed as the tallest in the park- was right by the
> parking lot. We quickly found it and in true ENTS style I set about
> measuring it as carefully as possible. I used a repeatable trunk flare
> spot as a reference to base all shots upon. I found two solid sightings
> very close to 180 degrees apart so as to provide a good replicate for
> height determination. This giant tree, 15.3 feet in diameter is called
> the "Mother of the Forest". I don't think it is the biggest tree by
> volume that we saw but it is a huge beast with a straight trunk and no
> obvious reiterations. The top appeared well formed but due to the
> relatively short distance I was able to move away from the tree and
> still see it I could have missed the highest point by a few feet (see
> photo below). I explored the top intently for a long time with the laser
> and the two shots yielded heights of 287.4 and 287.7 feet. There is no
> possible way this tree could be 329 feet tall- even with the "tangent"
> method :-). I'd like to know how this tree was measured but needless to
> say, not accurately!
>
> The "Mother of the Forest" taken from the first laser measuring point.
> Maybe in a century or two the sign will be correct.
>
> After we were picked up by our gracious hosts- my dad's cousin and
> family- we drove to Santa Cruz to see the Pacific Ocean and watch seals
> and surfers. The placid scene was accented by the gnarly Montezuma
> cypress dangling over the cliffs. An awesome day!
>
> Will F. Blozan
> President, Eastern Native Tree Society
> President, Appalachian Arborists, Inc.
>
>
>
>  image001.jpg
> 72KViewDownload
>
>  image002.jpg
> 45KViewDownload
>
>  image003.jpg
> 97KViewDownload
>
>  image004.jpg
> 66KViewDownload
>
>  image005.jpg
> 88KViewDownload
>
>  image006.jpg
> 94KViewDownload
>
>  image007.jpg
> 104KViewDownload
>
>  image008.jpg
> 33KViewDownload
>
>  image009.jpg
> 94KViewDownload
>
>  image010.jpg
> 94KViewDownload
>
>  image011.jpg
> 18KViewDownload- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org

You are subscribed to the Google Groups "ENTSTrees" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to