Jenny, As far as ENTS is concerned - it is not a problem. The key is to get any identification errors corrected. All of us have made mistakes and we when we find them, we fix them. On the website I tend to just edit out the errors in the original post on the webpages and replace it with the correct information to avoid confusion by readers. No problem.
Ed ----- Original Message ----- From: "JennyNYC" <[email protected]> To: "ENTSTrees" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 9:53 AM Subject: [ENTS] Aralia elata > > Hi, > > Well, I just asked a curator at NYBG and found out that it is Aralia > ELATA we have been weeding and that she is still in the process of > determining the status of spinosa in the Forest. > > This makes me really really mad. I was led to believe it was spinosa. > > So BBG may be right about the presence of spinosa, Carolyn. > > I'm really sorry I contributed the wrong info here. I don't understand > how there could have been such an incredible misunderstanding even > after I submitted id research. Not happy... > > Jenny > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org Send email to [email protected] Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
