Thanks to you all for understanding. Maybe when spring comes, I'll be
able to see the spinosa using the leaf id... if I haven't had my eyes
poked out by the elata.  (I read that one of the common names for the
elata is Japanese Angelica...devils, angels, all the same I guess!)

Thanks again,
Jenny

On Mar 23, 1:08 pm, Steve Galehouse <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jenny-
>
> It's nearly impossible to separate the two species while dormant---A. elata
> has a more pubescent leaf underside, and tends to grow somewhat taller.
>
> Steve
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:53 AM, JennyNYC <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > Well, I just asked a curator at NYBG and found out that it is Aralia
> > ELATA we have been weeding and that she is still in the process of
> > determining the status of spinosa in the Forest.
>
> > This makes me really really mad. I was led to believe it was spinosa.
>
> > So BBG may be right about the presence of spinosa, Carolyn.
>
> > I'm really sorry I contributed the wrong info here. I don't understand
> > how there could have been such an incredible misunderstanding even
> > after I submitted id research. Not happy...
>
> > Jenny
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
Send email to [email protected]
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to