That¹s something I¹ve noticed, too, that the older trees die faster.  But
that makes sense to me­ think about how fast young people bounce back from
health problems.  
--  
    Carolyn Summers
    63 Ferndale Drive
    Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706
    914-478-5712




From: x <[email protected]>
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:07:36 -0500
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [ENTS] Weather/adelgids and tree age/size

ENTS,
 
Is it just me or is it really the case the older/larger the tree, the
quicker those nasty wooly adelgids kill it?
We still have some scraggly young hemlock in the woods behind our house
(heavily infested but still somehow hanging on for now although they are
looking weaker) but anything of decent look or age has been dead for a
couple years for the most part and one area which may have had some
old-growth ones was already 100% dead many years back.
And I was horrified to see how fast those mega-giants in the smokies went,
many even after treatment   . I was really happy when I thought at least a
few of those ultra-grove had been saved....
 
SOme of it is just where a bird carrying them happens to land first too of
course as some groves here were certainly hit much earlier than others, but
once they are hit, I could swear the old giants actually fare much worse (I
would've guessed the opposite).
 
-Larry
 
 

From: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 11:03 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ENTS] Re: Weather

Lee, 

No, I'll gladly endure cold to see woolly adelgid killed. I'm just in a
complaining mood this morning.

Bob

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Frelich" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, January 8, 2010 9:56:29 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [ENTS] Re: Weather

Bob:

Cold weather does kill hemlock woolly adelgid. So, I take it that you
have decided its OK for the remaining old-growth hemlock to die so you
don't have to experience a few cold days.

Regarding ticks--you should see the new data we have from northern MN,
where we left several Hobos in the soil all winter. They measured
temperature every hour for the entire year. In the summer and fall, soil
temperature at a depth of 2 inches went up and down with air temperature
(although the response lagged air temperature by a day and was
damped--i.e. the rises and falls were of smaller magnitude than air
temperature.  As soon as the snow arrived, soil temperature went flat at
about 30 degrees F. Air temperature during winter fluctuated from -45 to
+45, and the soil temperature stayed absolutely constant. Soil
temperatures reached their minimums in late fall and early spring when
there was no snow, but there were a few days of colder than average air
temperatures.

So, thats why ticks survive in the boreal forests of northern MN. To
kill ticks, an arctic cold spell without any snow on the ground is
needed, so that soil temperatures get very cold. Of course that would
kill the trees too, because roots are not adapted to survive the range
of temperatures as the tops of trees.

Lee

[email protected] wrote:
> Will,
>
> Do you mind if ENTS moves in with you. I'm sick of winter already. It
> is snowing lightly outside now and the maximum temperature here at the
> house will likely not rise to over 25 today. Saturday night the
> temperature here at the house will likely be around 0.
>
> One advantage to cold weather I always thought was thinning out the
> populations of pests like ticks. But, if they're able to live through
> extremely low temperatures, what the heck good is really cold weather?
>
> Bob
>  
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Will Fell" <[email protected]>
> To: "ENTSTrees" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, January 8, 2010 8:57:46 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: [ENTS] Re: Weather
>
> Yes it is all relative. It was 70 degrees here New Years eve and fell
> like a rock Jan 1. Jan 12nd was the first below freezing morning this
> winter and all week we woke up to temps in the 20's and highs only
> about 50. This morning is the first day since Jan 1st we haven't
> awoken to temps below 32. It was only 35 this morning, but the "warm
> spell" won't last as it is to head to the low 20's tonight. Normally
> we will get a day or two of cold weather then it will blow out to sea.
> The cold has been the lead story in all the papers the past few days
> and everyone is fussing about it. I imagine folks in New England would
> be running around in shorts in this weather, but it has us in the deep
> south shivering.
>
> But I really wonder about the ticks. Here in South GA ticks are not a
> problem like up north. You will get an occaisional tick, but not like
> some places further north where you can't go in the woods without
> spraying down. And we do not have lyme disease dispite having a heavy
> deer population. So I really wonder if ticks and Lyme disease are
> responsive to cold weather.
>
> WF
>
> On Jan 8, 7:34 am, Beth <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Ents,
> > Wednesday night/Thursday day we here in St. Louis got between 3-6
> > inches of snow. While this is not much the problem was the cold front
> > that came with it. High temps for yesterday were in the teens and
> > today and tomorrow the highs are to be in the single temps.  Of course
> > the wind chills have been -10 and below.  This is heading towards the
> > Northeast today.  I hope that everyone there dresses warmly and in
> > layers if they have to get outside.
> >
> > I hope that this bitter cold (yes I know Lee, this isn't cold for you)
> > kills off some of the ticks around here. I am tired of pulling them
> > off of me along with getting Lyme.
> >
> > Beth


<<image.gif>>

<<image.gif>>

<<image.gif>>

Reply via email to