I don't think there's any difference optically, but the MK 1 has a metal
mount, the II has a plastic one. This tends to keep the price of the Mk
close to or even a little higher than the newer one.
The Mk 1 is so sharp that every time I start to think about buying the 1.4,
I end up talking myself out of it.
Good luck!
tom p
----- Original Message -----
From: "Weston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2000 6:29 PM
Subject: EOS EF 50/1.8 mkI vs mkII
> I'm in the market for a 50/1.8 and i've been offered a 50/1.8 mkI used for
> the same price as i can get the mkII new. I was wondering if you guys have
> any opinions on what is better and why i might wnat to buy the mkI as i've
> heard that they are better than the II
>
> Thanks
>
> Weston
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
