> Looking for comments on this lens.I presently have a Tamron 100-300
> 3.5-5.6 and use it frequently but I am not always happy with some of the
> images it produces but for that matter I am not always happy with my eos
> 28-105. Anyway I am looking for some user comments on this lens, I
> thought I might buy it to replace my tamron and then eventually sell it
> and move up to the 70-200L (my dream lens). I am somewhat concerned with
> the rather slow aperture of the 100-300L so your comments would be
> appreciated.
I've owned the 100-300L f/5.6. Hated it and sold it off in less than a
month. The slowness was really a problem for me and I found it almost
impossible to use handheld. Maybe if you do mostly tripod work it might
work out for you. Even the "sharpness" of the lens was disappointing to
me. The problem is that there is no easy alternatives for you in this
range and price. I eventually opted for the 300 f/4 L IS and haven't
regretted it although shelling out the dough hurt at first.
Good luck,
Jeff
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
