Robb wrote:
Thanks everyone for the info on lenses.
I am considering the 17-35mm and the 35-350mm.
How dust and water proof are these lenses?
How much better is the Canon 17-35mm over the third party equivelents?
thanks again
Robb Duncan - www.fotodog.net
______________________________________________________________________
Wow! What a combo. I think you could save $800 and use the Sigma 17-35
F2.8-4 unless of courese you absolutely need F2.89 all the time in which
case the Canon is the only way to go.
As to the 35-350mm lens, you may be better off with the 100-400 which has IS
and buy a cheap but far sharper 50mm F1.8.
Just my 3 cents.
Peter K
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
