John Gunderson wrote:
> Bob,
>
> Look to me like you are looking for an excuse to buy yourself another L lens.
Rats! You saw through my plan! I wonder if my wife will..... ;-)
I have the 28-70L and 70-200 2.8L lenses. I love them but I would not
take them to DisneyWorld. I think the 70-200 2.8L is way too heavy for
just carrying around for snapshots. I would think that the 70-200 focal
length would be too much telephoto and the 28-105 or 27-70 would me much
better suited for that stuff. I can't imagine carrying the 70-200 2.8L
around and going on rides. I would be too afraid that ir would get
banged around and it is so heavy.
>
> Don't get me wrong here, I love my 70-200 2.8L. I will never give it up. Just go
>buy the 70-200L and take the 28-105 to DisneyWorld!
>
> John
Thanks John, and all others that commented on my question.
It looks like the Tokina 19-35 and the 28-105 will be all that I take.
Thanks again to all the replied.
Bob
--
//////
( 0 0 )
-73 de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Everybody has a photographic memory. Some just don't have any film.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
