--- CP Henshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (1) When shooting landscapes with a 24mm lens, the
> available depth of field
> generally makes the usage of the tilt function of
> the 24mm TS-E lens
> unnecessary.
I do not use the TS-E for landscape all that much. But
there is one thing I can imagine would be neat to do,
independent of the focal length. When you tilt the
lens and use a big aparture you can make the picture
sharp along a line. This makes it possible to lead the
viewers eye from one point to another.
> (3) External shots of buildings with the TS-E 24mm
> lens would often require
> the camera to be quite close to the building (to
> fill the frame) and a
> better working distance would be available with a
> 35mm to 45mm lens.
The problem is that often you do not have the working
distance. At least in cities. The nice thing is that
you can use the converter with the TS-E lens. So when
you really need more working distance you can easily
get it.
I can't compare the TS-E 24 with the 45 since I do not
own the later.
Robert
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
