On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Robert Meier wrote:
> --- CP Henshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > (3) External shots of buildings with the TS-E 24mm
> > lens would often require
> > the camera to be quite close to the building (to
> > fill the frame) and a
> > better working distance would be available with a
> > 35mm to 45mm lens.
>
> The problem is that often you do not have the working
> distance. At least in cities. The nice thing is that
I feel the same way. Many times you really need that 24mm when
photographing in the cities. But if there is enough distance, the 45 might
be better.
> you can use the converter with the TS-E lens. So when
This is something I would have suggested also. The Canon EF 2x does fit
into the TS-E lenses. That will give you 48mm lens. Try that. Sure the
quality will suffer a bit, but I think it's still worth a try. (I
personally can accept the quality from that combo easily.) BTW, don't you
get more shifting capability with 24+2x than with 45...
Sorry, I too can not compare the lenses you ask. I don't own either, and I
have only used the TS-E 24mm L...
Bye,
Hugo.
************************************************************
** Hugo Gävert **
** [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hut.fi/~hugo **
************************************************************
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
