I've read that the old 28-70 3.5-4.5 II lens, whilst suffering from lousy UI, (rotating end that enters the barrel) has far better sharpness than most other of Canon's cheap zooms. Can anyone out there with this lens comment on whether this assertion is, in fact, true? I'd be comparing it to, say, the 28-105 3.5-4.5 I. - Neil K. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS Comments sought on 28-70 3.5-4.5 II Neil K.
- Re: EOS Comments sought on 28-70 3.5-4.5 II Markus Proske
- Re: EOS Comments sought on 28-70 3.5-4.5 II Frederico Samarane
- Re: EOS Comments sought on 28-70 3.5-4.5 I... Markus Proske
- Re: EOS Comments sought on 28-70 3.5-4.5 II GSmith3805
- Re: EOS Comments sought on 28-70 3.5-4.5 II Ken Durling
- Re: EOS Comments sought on 28-70 3.5-4.5 I... Bill White
- Re: EOS 28-135 IS [was: EOS Comments sough... F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS Comments sought on 28-70 3.5-4.5 I... Frederico Samarane
- Re: EOS Comments sought on 28-70 3.5-4.5 II GSmith3805
