> > > I've read that the old 28-70 3.5-4.5 II lens, whilst suffering from > > > lousy UI, (rotating end that enters the barrel) has far better > > > sharpness than most other of Canon's cheap zooms. > > > > I wouldn't use "far better" but indeed it's a tack sharper than the 24-85 > or > > the 28-135. > > > > -Markus Proske > > > I agree, I have one 28-135 IS and keept the 28-70 II it is amazing. The > results are very close of the 28-70 2.8 L. ..and I sold mine :-( -Markus * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- EOS Comments sought on 28-70 3.5-4.5 II Neil K.
- Re: EOS Comments sought on 28-70 3.5-4.5 II Markus Proske
- Re: EOS Comments sought on 28-70 3.5-4.5 II Frederico Samarane
- Re: EOS Comments sought on 28-70 3.5-4.5 I... Markus Proske
- Re: EOS Comments sought on 28-70 3.5-4.5 II GSmith3805
- Re: EOS Comments sought on 28-70 3.5-4.5 II Ken Durling
- Re: EOS Comments sought on 28-70 3.5-4.5 I... Bill White
- Re: EOS 28-135 IS [was: EOS Comments sough... F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS Comments sought on 28-70 3.5-4.5 I... Frederico Samarane
- Re: EOS Comments sought on 28-70 3.5-4.5 II GSmith3805
- Re: EOS Comments sought on 28-70 3.5-4.5 II Skip
- Re: EOS Comments sought on 28-70 3.5-4.5 I... Frederico Samarane
- Re: EOS Comments on Ef 28-135 IS lens Jim Davis
