I have the 28-135 and the Kenko 1.4x Pro 300 TC, and I would NEVER have
considered this a viable pair because the 28-135 is slow to begin with. I've
wonderd why Canon's 1.4 costs more than the 2x, strangely the Kenko 1.4x
only has 5 elements and the 2x has 7.
And another thing to consider before using the Kenko anyway on your lens -
since it's made to match the Canon "white" lenses, it looks funny with a
black lens.
Undoubtedly, the 1.4 has better final quality than the 2x. I use my Kenko
1.4 with the Canon 70-200/2.8 and 300/4 and have been pleased with the
results.
Tom P.
----- Original Message -----
From: "TRIFFONOV, Stillian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 3:41 AM
Subject: EOS Canon converters: x1.4 or x2.0
> Dear group,
>
> I am considering buying a Canon converter for my. Can you tell me from
your
> experience which converter has better quality x1.4 or x2.0? And why x1.4
is
> more expensive than x2.0?
> Do you think x2.0 + 28-138 will be a good combination?
>
> Stills
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
