On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:04:28 -0500, you wrote: >I chose the Sekonic L-508. It's all everything. Very accurate. >Durable. Expensive, but a lifetime investment. Over a period of time >the Sekonic name signifies quality. > >Ray Amos You all have convinced me. I'm going for the L-508. It's nice when choices aren't *quite* so hard, like with lenses. Thanks, everyone. Ken Durling http://home.earthlink.net/~kdurling/ * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- EOS OT Poll: handheld meters Ken Durling
- Re: EOS OT Poll: handheld meters M.J.Shupe
- RE: EOS OT Poll: handheld meters Chuck Skinner
- RE: EOS OT Poll: handheld meters Ananda Subramaniam
- RE: EOS OT Poll: handheld meters Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- Re: EOS OT Poll: handheld meters YEGEY
- RE: EOS OT Poll: handheld meters Richard
- Re: EOS OT Poll: handheld meters Innoyen
- Re: EOS OT Poll: handheld meters Ray Amos
- Re: EOS OT Poll: handheld meters Ken Durling
- Re: EOS OT Poll: handheld met... Bob Turner
- RE: EOS OT Poll: handhel... Dick
- Re: EOS OT Poll: handhel... Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS OT Poll: handhel... F. Craig Callahan
- RE: EOS OT Poll: handheld meters Robins, Stuart R
- Re: EOS OT Poll: handheld meters M.J.Shupe
- Re: EOS OT Poll: handheld meters Rafal Walas
- RE: EOS OT Poll: handheld meters Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- Re: EOS OT Poll: handheld meters M.J.Shupe
- Re: EOS OT Poll: handheld meters Ray Amos
