----- Original Message -----
From: "F. Craig Callahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: EOS Re: IS vs. non-IS Sharpness (300/4L)
> Typo Alert!!!
>
> "F. Craig Callahan" wrote:
>
> > I myself noted that KEH has an EF 400/5.6L (non-IS) for $999.
>
> To the best of my knowledge there has never been an IS version of this
lens.
>
> fcc
So what's the typo. They would in fact have definitely had the non-IS one,
since there is no IS model!
:<)
And as for the discussion that ensued about IS versus non-IS, I honestly
thought you said the IS was sharper, not the other way around.
But I've learned my lesson. Questions like that in this group are like
bashing the F100 on one of the rec.photo.* groups.
Tom P.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
