> Kim wrote:
> I think my post above wasn't clear--what I meant was that according to
> photozone (which is a compilation of data from users), the 70-200 f2.8
with
> 2X TC autofocuses much slower than the 100-400.
_______________________________________________________________
>
> Then in that case, forget it. People will always talk up what they own.
> Go for the 100-400, with a 1.4x you get a capable 560mm F8 that you can
> use handheld. Can't say that about 70-200 as no matter what its a
> 140-400mm F5.6 with 2x, unless of course you stack the TCs. Then you'll
> need a tripod!! ;-)
But apparently the folks who own the 70-200 f2.8 with 2X TC aren't talking
it up--they're the ones reporting slow AF!
Kim
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
