Dan Honemann wrote:
>
>
> Ken,
>
> There's really no objective measure (to my mind, at least) of "good"
> or "bad" bokeh. If the background traits of an image work for you,
> then I would say it's good; if not, it's bad--that simple.
Couldn't agree more. All there is, is "different" bokeh. Sometimes
a smooth rendition is "good", sometimes it's "bad". Overall, a smooth
rendition will help the image in a higher percentage of images. Still,
if you are mainly taking a style of pictures that would be helped by
a not so smooth rendition of out of focus highlights, the supposedly
"good" bokeh may actually be bad for you.
Thomas Bantel
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
