Dan Honemann wrote: (edited)
There's really no objective measure (to my mind, at least) of "good"
or "bad" bokeh. If the background traits of an image work for you,
then I would say it's good; if not, it's bad--that simple.
For my tastes, I find the background in the photo you reference...
http://home.earthlink.net/~kdurling/wsn8FF0.html
... to be quite distracting: the subject gets lost in a sea of bright
spheroids. In effect, the background noise overwhelms the flower and
really becomes the subject of the photo. Again, this is not "bad"
and may even be good depending on what you want to express.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
That's the lens ghosting. Internal reflections and the aperture are what is
showing.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
