"Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" schrieb: > > Henry Posner/B&H Photo-Video wrote: > > There was a Canon 20-35mm f/2.8L EF (Canon USA # C219512). Non-USM, with > internal focusing, 15 elements in 12 groups, 72mm accessory size. > Discontinued. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Henry, > > Check again. The last 20-35mm F2.8L was a USM lens. > Most definitely not. I should know because I won one. ;-) Thomas Bantel * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? John Pattenden
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Dan Honemann
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Bob Meyer
- RE: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Henry Posner/B&H Photo-Video
- RE: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Kim
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Robert Meier
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Bob Sull
- RE: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? F�lix L�pez de Maturana
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? YEGEY
- RE: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
