--- Dan Honemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there a 20-35/2.8L? I thought there were just > 17-35/2.8L and 20- > 35/3.5-4.5 EF lenses. The 20-35 2.8L was the predecessor to the 17-35. It's been discontinued since the 17-35 came out, but is readily available used. ===== Bob Meyer Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Harrie Frericks
- RE: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Dave Buyens
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? John M. Lovda
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? John Pattenden
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Dan Honemann
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Thomas Bantel
- RE: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Bob Meyer
- RE: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Henry Posner/B&H Photo-Video
- RE: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Kim
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.... Robert Meier
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.... Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Bob Sull
- RE: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? F�lix L�pez de Maturana
