At 09:40 AM 05/15/2001, you wrote: >Is there a 20-35/2.8L? I thought there were just 17-35/2.8L and 20- >35/3.5-4.5 EF lenses. There was a Canon 20-35mm f/2.8L EF (Canon USA # C219512). Non-USM, with internal focusing, 15 elements in 12 groups, 72mm accessory size. Discontinued. -- regards, Henry Posner Director of Sales and Training B&H Photo-Video, and Pro-Audio Inc. http://www.bhphotovideo.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Harrie Frericks
- RE: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Dave Buyens
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? John M. Lovda
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? John Pattenden
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Dan Honemann
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Bob Meyer
- RE: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Henry Posner/B&H Photo-Video
- RE: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Kim
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.... Robert Meier
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.... Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Bob Sull
- RE: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? F�lix L�pez de Maturana
- Re: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? YEGEY
- RE: EOS 17-35 2.8 L or 24 1.4 L? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
