On Wed, 06 Jun 2001 11:22:29 -0000, you wrote:
>
>Yes, their SW lenses are a *lot* more expensive than the normal AF or
>AF-I versions of the same lens. In the UK, the 80-200/2.8 is pretty
>much twice the price to have the SW version.
Sorry - don't know much about NIkon: is SW the equivalent of Canon's
USM?
Ken Durling
Website http://home.earthlink.net/~kdurling/
Alternate e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
