--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Marc S. Fogel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An eyeglass wearer would not benefit from one or the other
> (1V vs. 3)
Why not? The 1v has .5 mm more eye relief than the 3 (and 100%
coverage to boot). I wear eyeglasses, and do find that the view in
the 1v is a bit easier to scan than the one in the 3 (though
admittedly both require some scanning).
Dan
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
