> > My 20-40mm Tamron is superb. Case in point, it is well known that the
>24mm
> > Sigma F2.8 is far sharper than the equivalent Canon 24mm F2.8 lens.
>Again,
> > not optimistic, just truthful. ;-)
"far sharper"? Really?
Sharpness alone doesn't make any lens good but I quess we knew that
already.
I find my EF24/2.8 very good and even if photodo.com gives Sigma
2.5% better (3.9 vs. 4.0) rating I wouldn't call any difference
that small "significant". There must be other tests which I haven't
seen but I would like to see exact quotation of the test instead of
a second (or more) generation personal interpretations of it.
In general, aren't we sometimes a bit too much interested in
nitpicking about small differencies here? Are we experienced enough
to make this kind of judgements or are we just repeating others who
possibly don't know any better?
Just mildly agitating the discussion here to get it more interesting...
Vesa
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
