At 5:03 PM -0700 7/10/01, Chip Louie wrote:
>I want to mention that I also thought about the new Canon EF 100 2.8USM
>macro but this lens has too slow an aperture to get the nice blown out
>backgrounds like the EF 85 1.8USM and EF 100 2USM lenses for portraits.
Hm. Do you really find there's a huge difference between shooting at
f/2 and f/2.8 for blurry backgrounds? Lots of people use the 70-200
2.8L, which is also only 2.8.
- Neil K.
--
49N 16' 123W 7' / Vancouver, BC, Canada / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The satin finish provides darkly deviant good looks
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
